Supreme Court Grants Financial Autonomy to Local Governments

In a landmark decision on Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for state governors to control funds designated for local government administrations. This decision ensures that the 774 local government councils in the country will now manage their own finances independently.

Supreme Court Grants Financial Autonomy to Local Governments

The seven-man panel, led by Justice Emmanuel Agim, emphasized that the nation’s government is divided into three distinct arms: federal, state, and local. The court asserted that state governments do not have the authority to appoint caretaker committees for local government councils, which must be governed by democratically elected officials.

“A democratically elected local government is sacrosanct and non-negotiable,” stated the court.

The ruling criticized state governments for undermining the democratic process by appointing their own loyalists to local councils, which undermines the councils’ ability to function effectively. This practice, the court warned, perpetuates a dangerous trend.

The lawsuit, filed by the Attorney General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), on behalf of the Federal Government, sought full autonomy and direct funding for all 774 local government councils. In response, the 36 state governments, through their attorneys general, argued that the Supreme Court did not have the jurisdiction to hear the case.

In his judgment, Justice Agim affirmed that the Attorney General of the Federation has the legal standing to bring the lawsuit and uphold the constitution. He stated, “I hold that the plaintiff’s request is hereby approved and all the reliefs granted.”

More details to follow as the implications of this decision unfold…

Read also: