In a ruling that has quickly become a reference point in discussions about online accountability in Nigeria, a Federal High Court in Lagos has sentenced an X user to prison for spreading a false and highly distressing claim about the daughter of popular Nigerian music stars Adekunle Gold and Simi.
The case stems from a viral post made on X, formerly Twitter, in which the user falsely announced that the couple’s young daughter, Adejare, widely known as Deja, had died following a brief illness. The post spread rapidly across the platform within minutes, drawing thousands of reactions, reposts, and comments before it was eventually debunked as completely untrue.
The false information caused widespread panic and emotional distress among fans of the couple. Many users initially believed the story and shared condolences, unaware that the report had no factual basis. By the time credible sources confirmed that the child was alive and well, the misinformation had already reached a large audience and triggered significant public outrage.
Following the incident, the Kosoko family, through their legal representatives, initiated formal complaints and pursued legal action against the account responsible. Working alongside the Cybercrime Unit of the Nigerian Police Force, investigators traced the digital activity linked to the post. The suspect was identified, arrested, and charged under provisions of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, which covers offenses such as cyberstalking, defamation, and the spread of false information capable of causing public disorder or emotional harm.
During court proceedings, evidence presented showed that the post was not a mistake or rumor but a deliberate act intended to attract attention and engagement online. The prosecution argued that the content was crafted in a way that maximized shock value, thereby increasing its chances of going viral, regardless of the emotional consequences for those affected.
Read more on: Adekunle Gold Reveals Why He Wished for Death in His 20s
In delivering judgment, the presiding judge strongly condemned the act, describing it as a reckless misuse of digital platforms and an abuse of free expression. The court emphasized that while social media allows for open communication, it does not grant immunity for spreading falsehoods that can harm individuals or disturb public peace. The judge further noted that fabricating the death of a child for attention crossed a serious moral and legal boundary.
The defendant was found guilty on charges relating to cyberstalking and the intentional dissemination of false information. The court sentenced the individual to three years in prison, rejecting any option of a fine. The judge explained that a custodial sentence was necessary to serve as a strong deterrent to others who might engage in similar conduct, especially in an era where misinformation spreads rapidly online.
Throughout the legal process, Adekunle Gold and Simi maintained a largely private stance, avoiding public engagement with the matter while prioritizing their family’s privacy. However, after the verdict, their legal representatives issued a statement expressing satisfaction with the outcome. They described the ruling as not only a victory for the family but also a broader win for responsible digital behavior and the protection of individuals from targeted online harm.
The statement also stressed that while public figures are often subject to rumors and criticism, deliberately fabricating the death of a child goes beyond acceptable limits of speech and should be met with firm legal consequences. Simi has previously spoken about the toxic nature of online spaces, emphasizing that behind every public figure is a real family that can be deeply affected by false narratives.
Read more on: Court Remands Blessing CEO in EFCC Custody Over Alleged ₦36m Fraud
Legal analysts have described the judgment as a significant milestone in Nigeria’s evolving cybercrime enforcement landscape. It demonstrates an increasing willingness by authorities to track, investigate, and prosecute individuals who misuse anonymity or online platforms to spread harmful content. Many believe the ruling will set a precedent for future cases involving digital defamation and misinformation.
The case also highlights a broader issue facing modern social media platforms, where algorithms often reward sensational and emotionally charged content with higher visibility. In such an environment, some users are incentivized to post unverified or exaggerated claims in pursuit of attention, engagement, or online influence, often without considering the real world consequences.
This judgment serves as a warning that online actions carry real legal implications. It reinforces the idea that digital spaces are not exempt from the law and that individuals can be held accountable for content that causes harm, regardless of intent or platform.
As conversations continue around digital responsibility and online safety in Nigeria, this case stands as a reminder that the pursuit of engagement should never come at the expense of truth, dignity, or the emotional well being of others.
Read more on:
- Read mFrank Edoho’s Ex-Wife Sandra Breaks Silence,Levels Serious Allegations Against TV Host
- Frank Edoho breaks silence as Chike allegations and viral audio Stir online debate
- Nigeria to Host 2026 CAF Awards as Prestigious Ceremony Returns to West Africa
- Grammys Set Date for 2027 Award Nominations Announcement
